Annotation Extension Relation:has indirect input: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Definition) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Identifies an entity indirectly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process. | Identifies an entity indirectly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process. | ||
==Comment== | |||
If the entity is directly bound/acted upon by the gene product that is the subject of the annotation, then the relation: has_direct_input should be alternatively considered. | |||
==Synonyms== | |||
has_indirect_target EXACT | |||
indirectly_localizes NARROW | |||
==Child terms== | ==Child terms== | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 13 September 2012
Definition
Identifies an entity indirectly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process.
Comment
If the entity is directly bound/acted upon by the gene product that is the subject of the annotation, then the relation: has_direct_input should be alternatively considered.
Synonyms
has_indirect_target EXACT
indirectly_localizes NARROW
Child terms
- None
Scope of use
Domain
BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function)
Range
ENTITY_UNION:0000005 ! chemical, gene product, or complex
Annotation Extension Usage Examples
1. PMID:11278723 (Fig 3a) Overexpression of JIK increases the phosphorylation of TRAF2 (Q12933).
JIK (Q9H2K8) should be annotated to;
col 5: GO:0006468 ! protein phosphorylation col 16: has_indirect_input(Q12933)
Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation