Annotation Extension Relation:has indirect input: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''USAGE OF THIS RELATION HAS BEEN DEPRECATED'''
<pre style="color:#808080">
==Definition==
==Definition==


Line 40: Line 47:
----
----


 
</pre>
Back to [http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Annotation_usage_examples_for_each_annotation_extension_relation  Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation]
[[Category:Deprecated]]
 
[[Category:relations]]
[[Category:annotation extension]]

Latest revision as of 08:39, 27 September 2021

USAGE OF THIS RELATION HAS BEEN DEPRECATED


 


==Definition==

Identifies an entity indirectly affected (bound, transported, modified, consumed or destroyed) by the gene product's participation in a Molecular Function or Biological Process.

==Comment==

If the entity is directly bound/acted upon by the gene product that is the subject of the annotation, then the relation: has_direct_input should be alternatively considered.

==Synonyms==

has_indirect_target (EXACT)

indirectly_localizes (NARROW)

==Child terms==

* None

==Scope of use==

===Domain===

BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function) 

===Range===

[[ENTITY_UNION:0000005]] ! chemical, gene product, or complex

==Annotation Extension Usage Examples==


1. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=11278723 PMID:11278723] (Fig 3a)
Overexpression of JIK increases the phosphorylation of TRAF2 (Q12933).

JIK (Q9H2K8) should be annotated to;

  col 5: GO:0006468 ! protein phosphorylation
  col 16: has_indirect_input(Q12933)

----