Annotation Extension Relation:results in morphogenesis of: Difference between revisions
m (→Definition) |
m (→Using examples (from above) to demonstrate Folding_and_Unfolding using the relationship occurs_in) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
More examples of this usage of occurs_in can be found on the documentation page for [[Column_16:_Cell_Type]] | More examples of this usage of occurs_in can be found on the documentation page for [[Column_16:_Cell_Type]] | ||
== Using examples (from above) to demonstrate [[Folding_and_Unfolding]] using the relationship | == Using examples (from above) to demonstrate [[Folding_and_Unfolding]] using the relationship results_in_morphogenesis_of == | ||
'''1. A protein's involvement in changing a particular cell's shape:''' | '''1. A protein's involvement in changing a particular cell's shape:''' |
Latest revision as of 05:34, 16 May 2014
Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation
Definition
The relationship that links an entity with the process that results in the formation and shaping of that entity over time from an immature to a mature state.
Identifies the cell, tissue, or anatomical entity which are under going the morphogenic process.
Child terms
- None.
Scope of use
Domain
BFO:0000007 ! process (Biological Process or Molecular Function)
Range
ENTITY_UNION:0000006 ! entity
Annotation Extension Usage Examples
Enhancing Molecular Function and Biological Process Annotations
Specifying the cell or tissue type which are under going the morphogenic process
1. A protein's involvement in changing a particular cell's shape:
Statement from paper:
Eotaxin, eotaxin-2, and MCP-4 were the most potent inducers of eosinophil shape change, followed by MCP-3, while MCP-1 and IL-8 were inactive. MCP-4 alone showed a bell-shaped eosinophil dose-response curve over the dose range tested. Eotaxin and eotaxin-2 were inactive on monocytes (Fig. 2⇓B), whereas MCP-1, -3, and -4 all induced monocyte shape change, with MCP-3 exhibiting the highest potency.
Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Q99616 MCP4 | GO:0008360 regulation of cell shape | PMID:10072545 | IDA | results_in_morphogenesis_of(CL:0000771 eosinophil) 'pipe' results_in_morphogenesis_of(CL:0000576 monocyte) |
Note the use of the pipe to create a multiple annotation extensions. The interpretation of this annotation is MCP4 is involved in the regulation of eosinophil cell shape and monocyte cell shape.
More examples of this usage of occurs_in can be found on the documentation page for Column_16:_Cell_Type
Using examples (from above) to demonstrate Folding_and_Unfolding using the relationship results_in_morphogenesis_of
1. A protein's involvement in changing a particular cell's shape:
Note the use of the pipe to create a multiple annotation extensions.
Folded/unfolded | Gene Name (col 2) | GO ID (col 5) | Reference (col 6) | Evidence (col 7) | Annotation Extension (col 16) | Parent terms of new folded GO term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unfolded | Q99616 MCP4 | GO:0008360 regulation of cell shape | PMID:10072545 | IDA | results_in_morphogenesis_of(CL:0000771 eosinophil) 'pipe' results_in_morphogenesis_of(CL:0000576 monocyte) | |
Folded | Q99616 MCP4 | New GO ID regulation of eosinophil cell shape | PMID:10072545 | IDA | is_a regulation of cell shape | |
Folded | Q99616 MCP4 | New GO ID regulation of monocyte cell shape | PMID:10072545 | IDA | is_a regulation of cell shape |
Back to Annotation usage examples for each annotation extension relation