Electronic - Harold and Evelyn: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Annotation]] | |||
Here is a pdf outlining how IEA and RCA annotation is done at MGI | Here is a pdf outlining how IEA and RCA annotation is done at MGI | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Image:ensemblcompara.jpg]] | [[Image:ensemblcompara.jpg]] | ||
Evelyn's flowchart 30/02/07 | |||
[[Image:IEA flowchart draft2.ppt]]<br> | |||
Evelyn's flowchart 7/3/7 draft 3 by Jen | |||
[[Image:IEA flowchart draft3.ppt]]<br> | |||
Evelyn and Michelle's flowcharts together | |||
[[Image:ISS_and_IEA.ppt]]<br> | |||
Image below:<br> | |||
[[Image:IEA flowchart draft3 Image.png]] |
Latest revision as of 15:48, 23 April 2014
Here is a pdf outlining how IEA and RCA annotation is done at MGI
http://gocwiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Image:IEA_at_MGI.pdf
EVELYN: According to the GO Consortium guidelines any GO annotation that is created by electronic strategies should have appended to it the GO evidence code 'inferred from electronic annotation' (IEA). Electronic annotation is a very efficient way of annotating large datasets with GO terms. Each of the GOC databases uses a series of GO mapping files ... (will write more 2moro...Ev)
Figure 1. The large-scale assignment of GO terms to UniProtKB entries uses existing information within UniProtKB database entries and series of manual mappings.
Evelyn's flowchart 30/02/07
File:IEA flowchart draft2.ppt
Evelyn's flowchart 7/3/7 draft 3 by Jen
File:IEA flowchart draft3.ppt
Evelyn and Michelle's flowcharts together
File:ISS and IEA.ppt