Full Text Indexing Progress: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There are two separate fronts of progress for FTI. The first is in the | There are two separate fronts of progress for FTI. The first is in the | ||
indexing system itself; this would include things like software used | indexing system itself; this would include things like software used | ||
(Solr, Jetty , etc.), schema, deployment, and other low level issues | (Solr, Jetty, etc.), schema, deployment, and other low level issues | ||
that are probably not going to be hugely important to end-of-the-line | that are probably not going to be hugely important to end-of-the-line | ||
users and programmers. The second is the consumption and use | users and programmers. The second is the consumption and use | ||
Revision as of 16:45, 21 September 2010
Overview
There are two separate fronts of progress for FTI. The first is in the indexing system itself; this would include things like software used (Solr, Jetty, etc.), schema, deployment, and other low level issues that are probably not going to be hugely important to end-of-the-line users and programmers. The second is the consumption and use
While there are some blurry points in this distinction (e.g. what about a perl API or JSON service), hopefully it will provide a logical way to divide most of the problems that will be faced.
System Progress
Software Progress
Design Progress
One
Experimental
Two
???
Target
Software
Current
Past
- ...
- ...
- ...