Manager 19Sept2012: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Should the qualifier column in GPAD format be required? | Should the qualifier column in GPAD format be required? | ||
===Pasadena GOC Meeting=== | |||
Can we discuss what needs to be prepared by whom? Perhaps we can go through the agenda and put names next to anything that requires some prep. | |||
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] |
Revision as of 08:58, 18 September 2012
Agenda
Action follow-ups from last meeting
GO helpdesk JIRA set-up
All done?
Quarterly report
Action: PIs to come up with a mechanism to generate and follow-up quarterly aims
Action: Mike and the PIs will discuss this.
Discussion items
GPAD format specification
(From Rachael) The documentation (http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Gene_Product_Association_Data_%28GPAD%29_Format#File_Body_2) says that the qualifier column is optional, but I seem to remember that the idea was to have an explicit relation in this column for all annotations - Jane asked a similar question in the 15th August Manager's call that I'd again like to bring up; do we want to fully specify this column, retrofitting relationships for all terms? I'm not sure this was answered on the call.
Should the qualifier column in GPAD format be required?
Pasadena GOC Meeting
Can we discuss what needs to be prepared by whom? Perhaps we can go through the agenda and put names next to anything that requires some prep.