Manager 20Oct10: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '==Agenda== *ECO proposal: **Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) …')
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
*ECO proposal:
*ECO proposal:
**Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list?
**Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list?
**there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to adopt this system?
**there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to move to this system?


*Protein binding:
*Protein binding:

Revision as of 21:26, 19 October 2010

Agenda

  • ECO proposal:
    • Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list?
    • there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to move to this system?
  • Protein binding:
    • At the GOC meeting we agreed to explore the possibility of incorporating interaction data from bioGRID/Intact/IMAX. In terms of priority, where does this fit? Should we form a working group?
  • Evidence summation:
    • I started a wiki page with some notes. Again, not sure where it fits in terms of priority. Seems like ECO needs to be in place first. Can we form a WG and start discussing this regularly?