Manager 20Oct10: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Agenda==
==Present:==


==Discussion topics==
==Annotation==
*Updating annotation documentation
===Evidence Proposal===
http://gocwiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Chain_of_Evidence


*ECO proposal:
*ECO proposal:
Line 11: Line 18:
*Evidence summation:  
*Evidence summation:  
**I started a wiki page with some notes. Again, not sure where it fits in terms of priority. Seems like ECO needs to be in place first. Can we form a WG and start discussing this regularly?
**I started a wiki page with some notes. Again, not sure where it fits in terms of priority. Seems like ECO needs to be in place first. Can we form a WG and start discussing this regularly?
==Ref Genome==
==Ontology Development==
*Ruth emailed to request some ontology development meetings - Judy will forward email
*GOCHE completion - in time for grant? Paper probably be finished in time for renewal in Jan 2011, implementation some time later.
*BP x BP cross-products implemented
==Software==
*AmiGO 1.8 out soon
*OBO-Edit 2.1 - addresses outstanding bugs. There will be another maintenance release - 2.2 - before freeze.
*Have money for 3 one-year positions - Berkeley position filled, two still available at Stanford.==Agenda==

Revision as of 09:14, 20 October 2010

Present:

Discussion topics

Annotation

  • Updating annotation documentation

Evidence Proposal

http://gocwiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Chain_of_Evidence

  • ECO proposal:
    • Pascale mentioned that other curators were interested in knowing about the new ECO proposal. Can we post the proposal (and all the comments so far) on the biocurators mailing list?
    • there were some email exchanges about the proposal. What next? Should we form a WG, have conf.calls regularly and come to agreement? By when do we want to move to this system?
  • Protein binding:
    • At the GOC meeting we agreed to explore the possibility of incorporating interaction data from bioGRID/Intact/IMAX. In terms of priority, where does this fit? Should we form a working group?
  • Evidence summation:
    • I started a wiki page with some notes. Again, not sure where it fits in terms of priority. Seems like ECO needs to be in place first. Can we form a WG and start discussing this regularly?

Ref Genome

Ontology Development

  • Ruth emailed to request some ontology development meetings - Judy will forward email
  • GOCHE completion - in time for grant? Paper probably be finished in time for renewal in Jan 2011, implementation some time later.
  • BP x BP cross-products implemented

Software

  • AmiGO 1.8 out soon
  • OBO-Edit 2.1 - addresses outstanding bugs. There will be another maintenance release - 2.2 - before freeze.
  • Have money for 3 one-year positions - Berkeley position filled, two still available at Stanford.==Agenda==