Manager 5November2014: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " =Agenda= ===Transferring annotations to geneproducts in other strains=== <pre> Hi Rama, I have a quick question for you regarding how your group manually maps curated GO ann...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Agenda= | =Agenda= | ||
===Transferring annotations to geneproducts in | ===Transferring annotations to geneproducts in between strains=== | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Hi Rama, | Hi Rama, |
Revision as of 18:10, 4 November 2014
Agenda
Transferring annotations to geneproducts in between strains
Hi Rama, I have a quick question for you regarding how your group manually maps curated GO annotations from one bacterial strain to another of the same species. I was wondering if the best practice would be to use the same evidence code (e.g. IDA) for cases where I was looking at conservative ortholog calls for genes of the same species, different strains? Or should I use the ISO code and the with_from value (e.g. PseudoCAP:PA1777) to indicate the strain the function/process was observed in? I used the former approach when I originally did some GO mapping to Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in our database, but I'm now leaning toward the latter approach in order to make the logic behind the call more transparent. Do you have any opinion on which approach is best? Thanks for any help you can offer! Geoff