Manager 6November2013: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
##Would be good to have a coordinated set of talks - start a wiki page for ideas?
##Would be good to have a coordinated set of talks - start a wiki page for ideas?
##Submit a paper for the Database issue?  Just abstracts?
##Submit a paper for the Database issue?  Just abstracts?
'''Action Item:'''Add abstract deadline to GO calendar.
'''Action Item:'''Add abstract deadline to GO calendar - DONE [Suzi]
 
'''Action Item:'''Create wiki page for ideas.
'''Action Item:'''Create wiki page for ideas.

Revision as of 12:06, 6 November 2013

Agenda Items

Present: Rama, Rachael, David, Kimberly, Chris, Judy, Suzi

  1. Can we allow use of both a published paper and a GO_REF in the same annotation? Cardinality of the reference field can be >1, but the annotation documentation only refers to cases where a publication has identifiers in different databases, e.g. PubMed and a MOD database. I'd like to include a GO_REF for the WormBase Phenotype2GO-based annotations, but also still include the original publication from which the phenotype information was curated. The GO_REF would explain the methodology used to create the resulting Biological Process annotation. [Kimberly]
    1. Good idea. We can create a new subclass of IMP in ECO and use the gaf to eco mapping (which takes a evidence code + reference pair and maps it to an evidence type). But really we need a way to represent combinatorial evidence. This is analogous to F->P and P->C inferences, where we embed the fact an inference was made using assigned_by=GOC, which is not ideal.
  1. BioCurator Meeting - What are GO's plans for the meeting?
    1. Would be good to have a coordinated set of talks - start a wiki page for ideas?
    2. Submit a paper for the Database issue? Just abstracts?

Action Item:Add abstract deadline to GO calendar - DONE [Suzi]

Action Item:Create wiki page for ideas.