Manager Call 2016-04-06: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Agenda= ==Geneva GO Meeting== ===Items submitted for agenda:=== * Annotation of protein complexes, Sandra Orchard, 15 min talk, 15 min discussion, Friday. * InterPro2GO, Amai...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=Agenda=
=Agenda=
==Geneva GO Meeting==
==Geneva GO Meeting - Shore up agenda?==
===Items submitted for agenda:===
===Items submitted for agenda:===
* Annotation of protein complexes, Sandra Orchard, 15 min talk, 15 min discussion, Friday.
* Annotation of protein complexes, Sandra Orchard, 15 min talk, 15 min discussion, Friday.

Revision as of 10:44, 5 April 2016

Agenda

Geneva GO Meeting - Shore up agenda?

Items submitted for agenda:

  • Annotation of protein complexes, Sandra Orchard, 15 min talk, 15 min discussion, Friday.
  • InterPro2GO, Amaia Sangrador, 15 min talk, 5 min discussion, Friday.
  • Flash updates on ontology stats and ontology focused projects, Melanie/David OS/Paola, 45 min talk total (among the 3 of us), 15 min discussion, Friday anytime or Saturday morning.
  • Flash update on changes to Drupal website (Moni, PaulT)
  • Flash update on AmiGO, including work on parallel projectes, e.g. planteome (Seth)
  • Flash update on QuickGO (Tony)
  • Protein2GO updates and LEGO/Noctua bridging (Aleksandra)
  • LEGO/Reactome bridging (Seth)
  • Noctua/LEGO workshop - Friday afternoon - 3 hours?
    • Introduction to the tool using an annotation consistency exercise?
  • Addressing curation redundancy (http://jira.geneontology.org/browse/GO-1131) (Val?)
  • GO annotation statistics - PaulT
  • Set of files we produce and their format. Updated GPAD spec with extra columns (Tony)
  • Out-of-date JCVI annotations (https://trello.com/c/YRSPkeJb/157-out-of-date-jcvi-annotations). A proposal was made to retire JCVI files and make sure that as many of their experimental annotations as possible (41 in QuickGO) can consistently live on corresponding UniProt entries. Feedback?
  • GO website community annotation page and forms for contributors to complete (Ruth/Val 5 min presentation, 10 min discussion?) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mvMpW09kksDQ6QVpVf5O-0DOl9xbq_JaC4efOzogdus/edit?usp=sharing
  • Relations used for Biological Process annotations. In Barcelona, we proposed implementing an additional relation to capture the ambiguity of a gene's relation to a Biological Process. The implementation never happened, and with GAF outputs of LEGO models, the question becomes even more critical. It would be good to re-visit this issue, discuss the various proposals that have been made, and see if we still think it's appropriate to add this relation and if so, what steps need to be taken to do it. (Kimberly - 1 hour?)
  • Synapse project update (David OS, Paul T, Ruth L)
  • Making automation automatic - rationalising the inference pipeline (David OS)