Manager Call 2018-02-21: Difference between revisions
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
- Judy | - Judy | ||
[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEgyIHDMMZIMdFaR33jBaRg14d7-u6HKaI2couHTHXo/edit InterPro2GO Survey] | |||
*[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEgyIHDMMZIMdFaR33jBaRg14d7-u6HKaI2couHTHXo/edit InterPro2GO Survey] | |||
==USC developers hackaton jamboree report== | ==USC developers hackaton jamboree report== |
Revision as of 10:47, 20 February 2018
Call in info
https://stanford.zoom.us/j/754529609
Agenda
GO outreach role
Agenda for GOC meeting and SAB meeting
- People are starting to make their travel arrangements and would like more information about the exact dates, workshops, etc.
Annotation transfer across species (more generally, common annotation practices across groups)
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1807
Can we come up with a plan for annotation propagation across species moving forward? We have 3 main pipelines at the moment, PAINT, interpro2go, Ensembl (plus various groups may be using their own). Are all using the same rules? Are these clear? Do we need extra rules for blocking certain branches across certain levels? Are we all implementing the do-not-annotate subsets consistently? Do these need expanded, better strategy for response-to terms? - Chris
---
For example, in addition to PAINT, MGI brings in rat and human experimental annotations via ISO using MGI orthology assertions.
We do not use InterPro2GO for cross-species annotations.
The task first is, as you say, to gather status of major groups in this regard. This comes under AGR thinking too.
- Judy
USC developers hackaton jamboree report
Feb 7-8
Noctua V1 status report
GH ontology ticket marathon report
Feb 12-16, Denver
Outstanding from the docathon: What is a GO contributor, GO collaborator, and a GO resource?
see also website http://geneontology.org/page/contributors (Pascale) I want to double check this correctly represents people working on the project.
Minutes
- On call: