Manager Call 2019-02-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
Present: | Present: Judy, David, PaulT, Seth, Laurent-Philippe, Kimberly, Huaiyu, Chris, SuziA | ||
== General topics == | == General topics == | ||
* How to | * How to manage "unmanaged" external2go mappings (http://viewvc.geneontology.org/viewvc/GO-SVN/trunk/external2go/) ? | ||
* Getting rid of legacy SVN use | ** Do we want to take these over? Trying to sunset the SVN things that are still out there. | ||
* Getting rid of legacy SVN use (http://geneontology.org/docs/SVN-access/) | |||
** metadata/datasets/*.yaml | ** metadata/datasets/*.yaml | ||
** external2go | ** external2go | ||
** others? | ** others? | ||
=== References === | |||
*Proposed new GPAD specs allow for only one ID per reference (PMID) | |||
*This has implications for what is listed, and available for linkout, in AmiGO | |||
*Do we need to re-visit this decision? | |||
== Meeting Reports == | == Meeting Reports == | ||
Line 20: | Line 26: | ||
== Other project Reports == | == Other project Reports == | ||
=== Annotation Call === | |||
* | === Curating Preprints in bioRxiv === | ||
*Good discussion on the pros/cons of curating preprints, especially those found in bioRxiv | |||
*Although most groups would not choose to do this right now, we concluded that if a curator feels strongly that there is valuable information in a bioRxiv preprint, they may curate that paper | |||
*Proposed SOP (to be presented on manager's call for final approval): | |||
**Curator should determine that the preprint is the only published source of the data and that the data is of high quality | |||
**GO annotations can be made as usual, citing the unique accession of the preprint | |||
**If and when the preprint appears as a peer-reviewed publication, the curator needs to review the paper again, perhaps in collaboration with the authors, to make certain that the annotations are still correct | |||
**Existing and/or new annotations from the paper will then be updated to cite the accession for the peer-reviewed paper | |||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
* ??? | * ??? | ||
[[Category:GO Managers Meetings]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:30, 9 April 2019
Agenda
Present: Judy, David, PaulT, Seth, Laurent-Philippe, Kimberly, Huaiyu, Chris, SuziA
General topics
- How to manage "unmanaged" external2go mappings (http://viewvc.geneontology.org/viewvc/GO-SVN/trunk/external2go/) ?
- Do we want to take these over? Trying to sunset the SVN things that are still out there.
- Getting rid of legacy SVN use (http://geneontology.org/docs/SVN-access/)
- metadata/datasets/*.yaml
- external2go
- others?
References
- Proposed new GPAD specs allow for only one ID per reference (PMID)
- This has implications for what is listed, and available for linkout, in AmiGO
- Do we need to re-visit this decision?
Meeting Reports
- ???
Upcoming Meetings
- ???
Other project Reports
Annotation Call
Curating Preprints in bioRxiv
- Good discussion on the pros/cons of curating preprints, especially those found in bioRxiv
- Although most groups would not choose to do this right now, we concluded that if a curator feels strongly that there is valuable information in a bioRxiv preprint, they may curate that paper
- Proposed SOP (to be presented on manager's call for final approval):
- Curator should determine that the preprint is the only published source of the data and that the data is of high quality
- GO annotations can be made as usual, citing the unique accession of the preprint
- If and when the preprint appears as a peer-reviewed publication, the curator needs to review the paper again, perhaps in collaboration with the authors, to make certain that the annotations are still correct
- Existing and/or new annotations from the paper will then be updated to cite the accession for the peer-reviewed paper
Minutes
- ???