Manager Call 2019-02-13: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
== General topics ==
== General topics ==


* How to manage "unmanaged" [external2go mappings](http://viewvc.geneontology.org/viewvc/GO-SVN/trunk/external2go/) ?
* How to manage "unmanaged" external2go mappings (http://viewvc.geneontology.org/viewvc/GO-SVN/trunk/external2go/) ?
** Do we want to take these over? Trying to sunset the SVN things that are still out there.
** Do we want to take these over? Trying to sunset the SVN things that are still out there.
* Getting rid of legacy SVN use
* Getting rid of legacy SVN use (http://geneontology.org/docs/SVN-access/)
** metadata/datasets/*.yaml  
** metadata/datasets/*.yaml  
** external2go
** external2go
Line 39: Line 39:


* ???
* ???
 
[[Category:GO Managers Meetings]]
[[Category:GO Consortium]] [[Category:GO Managers Meetings ]]

Latest revision as of 10:30, 9 April 2019

Agenda

Present: Judy, David, PaulT, Seth, Laurent-Philippe, Kimberly, Huaiyu, Chris, SuziA

General topics

References

  • Proposed new GPAD specs allow for only one ID per reference (PMID)
  • This has implications for what is listed, and available for linkout, in AmiGO
  • Do we need to re-visit this decision?

Meeting Reports

  • ???

Upcoming Meetings

  • ???

Other project Reports

Annotation Call

Curating Preprints in bioRxiv

  • Good discussion on the pros/cons of curating preprints, especially those found in bioRxiv
  • Although most groups would not choose to do this right now, we concluded that if a curator feels strongly that there is valuable information in a bioRxiv preprint, they may curate that paper
  • Proposed SOP (to be presented on manager's call for final approval):
    • Curator should determine that the preprint is the only published source of the data and that the data is of high quality
    • GO annotations can be made as usual, citing the unique accession of the preprint
    • If and when the preprint appears as a peer-reviewed publication, the curator needs to review the paper again, perhaps in collaboration with the authors, to make certain that the annotations are still correct
    • Existing and/or new annotations from the paper will then be updated to cite the accession for the peer-reviewed paper

Minutes

  • ???