Manager Call 2019-02-27: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Agenda =
= Agenda =


Present:
Present: Chris, David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Judy, Paul T, Laurent-Philippe


== Discussion points ==
== Discussion points ==
Line 39: Line 39:


== Minutes ==
== Minutes ==
*GPAD/GPI spec
** Need to be finished by the Cambridge meeting
** Pascale emphasizes that it should be a public facing document that users are able to see.
** David reminds everyone that there should be only one spec instead of multiple working versions to avoid confusion. 
** Need a call to review the spec before the Cambridge meeting, and make final decisions. It can be at the annotation call.
* Moving no-GO-CAM annotations to GO Central
** Dustin wrote a script to do so.
** Biggest issue is to handle annotation extensions - need to write generalized rules.
** Reviewed the level of efforts for everyone involved in the project.
* GO data release pipline
** Project owner question. The current owner is Pascale, but Seth originally thought he was the owner. Need to clarify.
** Reviewed github tickets.
** Most of the discussions were side-tracked to the SynGO import.




[[Category:GO Managers Meetings ]]
[[Category:GO Managers Meetings ]]

Latest revision as of 06:31, 5 March 2019

Agenda

Present: Chris, David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Judy, Paul T, Laurent-Philippe

Discussion points

Management

  • Update on all ongoing projects: https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects
  • We need % effort from the different people involved in project for all projects with a delivery date/active projects
  • Should we create projects for (1) Proposed new Noctua widget (2) GPAD/GPI specs (3) Documentation (reopen?)
    • GPAD/GPI specs is already a github project
  • 'Gantt-chart' to manage projects: Hackathon tasks: how is that working ?

GPAD/GPI Specs

  • SO vs MSO - stick with SO for now?

Cambridge meeting: Review action items from Montreal

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QiqfZ5eAwmljqt5Fh0Ooi1Pd-HKgMSGsYC_wx6-UEPY/edit#

New IEAs (not InterPro2GO)

https://github.com/geneontology/helpdesk/issues/195


We decided earlier to not accept IEAs from outside groups, as all sequences would be run through the dependable InterPro2GO after uploading- but this group/method *seems* like they have more accurate annotations and higher coverage.

GOC meeting action items

In Cambridge Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QiqfZ5eAwmljqt5Fh0Ooi1Pd-HKgMSGsYC_wx6-UEPY/edit#

Priorities:

  1.  Moving existing annotations to GO-CAM

From last meeting minutes (by far not exhaustive)

  • Create working group to coordinate integration of IEAs (single source ideally): priority?
  • Handling redundant information: priority?

Minutes

  • GPAD/GPI spec
    • Need to be finished by the Cambridge meeting
    • Pascale emphasizes that it should be a public facing document that users are able to see.
    • David reminds everyone that there should be only one spec instead of multiple working versions to avoid confusion.
    • Need a call to review the spec before the Cambridge meeting, and make final decisions. It can be at the annotation call.
  • Moving no-GO-CAM annotations to GO Central
    • Dustin wrote a script to do so.
    • Biggest issue is to handle annotation extensions - need to write generalized rules.
    • Reviewed the level of efforts for everyone involved in the project.
  • GO data release pipline
    • Project owner question. The current owner is Pascale, but Seth originally thought he was the owner. Need to clarify.
    • Reviewed github tickets.
    • Most of the discussions were side-tracked to the SynGO import.