Manager Call 2019-07-17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Discussion points== | ==Discussion points== | ||
(from last week...): | (from last week...): | ||
* Did we decide to send out notices about GO-CAM tools releases? We need to get the spec done first. | * Did we decide to send out notices about GO-CAM tools releases? We need to get the spec done first. Those release notes are important to let curators know of the new functionalities and bug fixes | ||
* Report back from meeting with Rose Oughtred (BioGrid) about sharing data | * Report back from meeting with Rose Oughtred (BioGrid) about sharing data |
Revision as of 11:13, 17 July 2019
Agenda
- Agenda: David
- Minutes: Laurent-Philippe
Project status
GO-CAM specs
Kimberly, Pascale, Huaiyu, Laurent-Philippe, ...
Questions regarding Noctua-dev vs Noctua-prod
(Pascale) Background
- Ben asked to create test models |Ticket
- Kimberly and Pascale created about 30 models with the 'model-copy' functionality |Test models
- Ben, Seth, are saying that the models should have been created in Noctua-prod with a special status (since Noctua-dev is apparently not exactly the same implementation)
- Questions
- What is the purpose of Noctua-dev and Noctua-prod ?
- To redo the models on prod, it would be very useful to have the model-copy functionality there as well. What is blocking exactly ?
Discussion points
(from last week...):
- Did we decide to send out notices about GO-CAM tools releases? We need to get the spec done first. Those release notes are important to let curators know of the new functionalities and bug fixes
- Report back from meeting with Rose Oughtred (BioGrid) about sharing data
- They have 'phosphogrid' interaction data for S. cerevisiae and human
- This could potentially be used to capture MFs for enzymatic activities and targets
- Suggested she work with SGD for yeast data, but what about human?
- Priority level for this?