Manager Call 2020-06-17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
(Pascale) | (Pascale) | ||
[[GO_Managers]] | * See : [[GO_Managers]] page | ||
* Org chart: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1PcYpEtI_6g8fEvwnKVsZZ4lUy2XLbOcZSMlyLrIqo0k/edit#slide=id.g88a20b0a90_0_361 | |||
[[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] | [[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] |
Revision as of 04:01, 15 June 2020
Agenda
- Agenda: Laurent-Philippe
- Minutes: David
- Present:
- Regrets:
Isoforms NOT in AmiGO/products
(Pascale, from feedback from Ruth) https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/1105 Should they not be ?
Bader gene sets
Approach to handle gene sets redundancy.
They are deriving gene sets for GO, but are using EBI and MGI for human and mouse annotations: http://baderlab.org/GeneSets#Sources.
Proposals: 1) contact them to explain the benefits of fetching annotations from GOC instead of EBI/MGI instead of GOC 2) page on the go site to explain the above (differences & benefits from fetching annotations from GOC rather than a source; eg check, validations, etc) 3) some of Bader gene sets could be of interest for QC ?
Updated GO managers page to match the Project Org chart
(Pascale)