Managers 13Jan10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Participants: Agenda: Jen Minutes: David ==Action items from previous calls == *'''David, Tanya, Jane:''' Compose wiki documentation for ontology editors, with step-by-step …') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Participants: | Participants: | ||
Agenda: | Agenda: Jane | ||
Minutes: | Minutes: | ||
==Action items from previous calls == | ==Action items from previous calls == | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Jen:''' Draft wiki page to summarize motivation for MF-BP links - in progress | *'''Jen:''' Draft wiki page to summarize motivation for MF-BP links - in progress | ||
*'''Managers:''' Comment on draft proposal that Suzi will circulate (content meetings, RefGen annotations, etc.) - not sent | *'''Managers:''' Comment on draft proposal that Suzi will circulate (content meetings, RefGen annotations, etc.) - not sent | ||
==Discussion items== | ==Discussion items== | ||
* | *GOC moving over to using extended GO. Main issue seems to be with has_part - visualization, queries etc. How should we handle this? (the email was actually only asking about inter-ontology links, I know, but we should address this anyway). | ||
[[GO_Managers_conference_call_minutes|Back to minutes list]] | [[GO_Managers_conference_call_minutes|Back to minutes list]] |
Revision as of 10:03, 8 January 2010
Participants:
Agenda: Jane
Minutes:
Action items from previous calls
- David, Tanya, Jane: Compose wiki documentation for ontology editors, with step-by-step instructions on making cross-products - in progress (will start this week)
- Jen: Draft wiki page to summarize motivation for MF-BP links - in progress
- Managers: Comment on draft proposal that Suzi will circulate (content meetings, RefGen annotations, etc.) - not sent
Discussion items
- GOC moving over to using extended GO. Main issue seems to be with has_part - visualization, queries etc. How should we handle this? (the email was actually only asking about inter-ontology links, I know, but we should address this anyway).