OEWG 20120515: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
* | * Latest official release: 2.2 (I was going to call it 2.1.1 but decided that was too confusing) | ||
** | ** Passes the usual unit tests | ||
** Mike Cherry tested it in the pipeline and said it seemed fine | |||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
[[OBO-Edit_Working_Group_Meeting_Agenda_and_Minutes|Back to OEWG meeting agenda and minutes list]] | [[OBO-Edit_Working_Group_Meeting_Agenda_and_Minutes|Back to OEWG meeting agenda and minutes list]] |
Revision as of 17:19, 28 May 2012
OBO-Edit Working Group Meeting: Tuesday, June 5, 2012, 8:30am PDT
Conference call numbers:
US: 1 866 953 9688
UK: 0808 238 6001
PIN: 801561
Agenda/Chair: Nomi Harris
Minutes: Nomi
Attendees:
Bug and Feature Trackers
Fixed or newly added since last meeting
- Cycle Check doesn't work
- New cycle check method finds (possibly mixed-relationship) cycles by checking for objects that are descendants of one of their own children.
- The check works whether or not you have the reasoner on, but it doesn't find cycles that involve implied links found by the reasoner.
- The new cycle check is set by default to run on save and on manual verification; other times (e.g., on reasoner change) can be added by the user via the Verification Manager configuration panel.
- Name redundancy check not working in Text Editor
- It was checking for name redundancy when called with no arg (i.e., invoked from Verification Manager; check all terms) but not when called on a specific term (i.e., from Text Editor).
Currently working on
- Ramona reported that the reasoner seems much slower than it used to (took over a minute to reason over plant_ontology.obo).
- Nomi tried it and it ran as fast as ever (about 5 seconds for plant_ontology.obo). Not sure why it's going so slowly for Ramona.
Discussion
- Latest official release: 2.2 (I was going to call it 2.1.1 but decided that was too confusing)
- Passes the usual unit tests
- Mike Cherry tested it in the pipeline and said it seemed fine