Ontology meeting 2012-04-25: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===DISCUSSION ITEM I: Follow up on "Moving biological_process_xp_cellular_component into live GO"=== | ===DISCUSSION ITEM I: Follow up on chemical xps=== | ||
See previous discussion here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-04-11 | |||
This was followed up by an email thread on the go-editors list. Could we please discuss Jane's questions on the latest message in the thread: | |||
"I think we should definitely do that [i.e. in response to Chris' suggestion "just switch TG to point to UCHEBI and request further changes in CHEBI directly"]. So then new chemicals would only need to go into CHEBI, and we would add xps by hand to x-chemical-edit.obo? | |||
And then we wait to see if Heiko can figure a way to write the xps from TG1. | |||
The downside, I guess, is that we can't leverage the CHEBI structure to place new terms by using TG0 and cut/pasting?" | |||
We keep having frequent requests for chemical terms in SF, so it would be helpful to know how to proceed as effectively as possible. Thanks! | |||
===DISCUSSION ITEM II: Follow up on "Moving biological_process_xp_cellular_component into live GO"=== | |||
See previous discussion here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Ontology_meeting_2012-03-07 | See previous discussion here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Ontology_meeting_2012-03-07 | ||
===DISCUSSION ITEM | ===DISCUSSION ITEM III (related): Are we going to retrofit logical definitions for cell-type-specific cellular component terms?=== | ||
Some of these (e.g. neuron projection) are in the scratch directory as cellular_component_xp_cell.obo. | Some of these (e.g. neuron projection) are in the scratch directory as cellular_component_xp_cell.obo. | ||
Stems from this SF item: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3518879&group_id=36855&atid=440764 | Stems from this SF item: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3518879&group_id=36855&atid=440764 |
Revision as of 05:57, 24 April 2012
MINUTES: JANE
1 hour call
DISCUSSION ITEM I: Follow up on chemical xps
See previous discussion here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-04-11
This was followed up by an email thread on the go-editors list. Could we please discuss Jane's questions on the latest message in the thread:
"I think we should definitely do that [i.e. in response to Chris' suggestion "just switch TG to point to UCHEBI and request further changes in CHEBI directly"]. So then new chemicals would only need to go into CHEBI, and we would add xps by hand to x-chemical-edit.obo?
And then we wait to see if Heiko can figure a way to write the xps from TG1.
The downside, I guess, is that we can't leverage the CHEBI structure to place new terms by using TG0 and cut/pasting?"
We keep having frequent requests for chemical terms in SF, so it would be helpful to know how to proceed as effectively as possible. Thanks!
DISCUSSION ITEM II: Follow up on "Moving biological_process_xp_cellular_component into live GO"
See previous discussion here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Ontology_meeting_2012-03-07
Some of these (e.g. neuron projection) are in the scratch directory as cellular_component_xp_cell.obo.
Stems from this SF item: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3518879&group_id=36855&atid=440764