Ontology meeting 2012-09-05
30-minute meeting
MINUTES: Paola
ATTENDEES:
DAILY DIGEST EMAILS FOR NEW/OBSOLETED/CHANGED GO TERMS
We haven't been getting them for a while. They were quite useful, could they be reinstated please?
FOLLOW-UP: EC numbers in GO - feasibility study
Carried over from a previous meeting: see Action Items and background here:
Future Ontology Editor
From the end of an email I just read from Chris: "We have to get away from asserting these in the editors file though. The options are abandon oboedit or allow Elk to be called from within OE.".
Can Heiko comment on how difficult this would be to do in OE? The problem with Protege 4 is that it has no resources for development, nor is it likely to, so I'm not convinced whole-hearted adoption is the answer right now. Unless there's an option for us to develop P4?