Ontology meeting 2012-10-18: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
===Discussion item: cell-cell junctions===
===Discussion item: cell-cell junctions===
Related to [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3576435&group_id=36855&atid=440764]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells?
Related to [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3576435&group_id=36855&atid=440764]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells?
===FOLLOW-UP: asserting/adding tag for inferred links===
Did Heiko and Chris make any progress getting Stanford to change whatever they had to change?


===FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms===
===FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms===

Revision as of 06:51, 17 October 2012

MINUTES: Paola

ATTENDEES:


FOLLOW-UP: ChEBI paper

Did the PIs give us any comments?

Discussion item: cell-cell junctions

Related to [1]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells?

FOLLOW-UP: asserting/adding tag for inferred links

Did Heiko and Chris make any progress getting Stanford to change whatever they had to change?

FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms

See background here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-10-11


FOLLOW-UP: EC numbers in GO - feasibility study

Carried over from a previous meeting: see Action Items and background here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-08-08#FOLLOW-UP:_EC_numbers_in_GO_-_feasibility_study