Ontology meeting 2013-01-24: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Jane has prepared a list of candidate users. Next step: circulate/advertise. DONE. TermGenie gatekeepers, please remember to delete the termgenie_unvetted subset line if a new term looks straightforward. Suggested strategy for non-straightforward terms: contact submitter; if necessary, discuss among editors; any more comments/suggestions? | Jane has prepared a list of candidate users. Next step: circulate/advertise. DONE. TermGenie gatekeepers, please remember to delete the termgenie_unvetted subset line if a new term looks straightforward. Suggested strategy for non-straightforward terms: contact submitter; if necessary, discuss among editors; any more comments/suggestions? | ||
===Sync issue between editors version and release versions?=== | |||
We still haven't got to the bottom of this. The example is GO:0019064. In go.owl, go.obo etc it has three parents. In go-trunk/ontology/editors/gene_ontology_write.obo it has two (missing GO:0048610 cellular process involved in reproduction which I removed). | |||
===Protein/glycoprotein/lipoprotein terms in ChEBI=== | ===Protein/glycoprotein/lipoprotein terms in ChEBI=== |
Revision as of 08:46, 23 January 2013
MINUTES: Jane
ATTENDEES:
ChEBI paper
Anything missing/left to do before (pre)submission?
'Releasing' TermGenie free form
Jane has prepared a list of candidate users. Next step: circulate/advertise. DONE. TermGenie gatekeepers, please remember to delete the termgenie_unvetted subset line if a new term looks straightforward. Suggested strategy for non-straightforward terms: contact submitter; if necessary, discuss among editors; any more comments/suggestions?
Sync issue between editors version and release versions?
We still haven't got to the bottom of this. The example is GO:0019064. In go.owl, go.obo etc it has three parents. In go-trunk/ontology/editors/gene_ontology_write.obo it has two (missing GO:0048610 cellular process involved in reproduction which I removed).
Protein/glycoprotein/lipoprotein terms in ChEBI
SF request on ChEBI tracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703818&aid=3592472&group_id=125463
There was an email thread ('protein in CHEBI and PRO') between Chris and Darren, but no conclusion was reached as far as I [Paola] can see. Chris, was there any further follow-up to your message below:
'CHEBI is open ended here:
CHEBI:33709 ! amino acid [DEF: "A carboxylic acid containing one or more amino groups."]
It doesn't *exclude* the amino acid including attached bits.
It seems the isa/has_part confusion permeates CHEBI even after all our work aligning with GO. Or maybe it's just me that's confused - is there some documentation I'm missing?
Anyway, it seems the direction we're going is a more liberal definition that is inclusive of attached bits. Does this fit with our intended inferences in GO?'
Daily digest emails for new/edited/obsoleted terms (obo-diff.html)
Heiko/Chris, is it feasible to 'convert' the Jenkins diff into emails (what curators really wish for)?
Update on cell cycle meeting
Dates confirmed: Feb. 28th and March 1st.
Confirmed attendees: Val, Jacqueline Hayles, David, Tanya, Jane, Paola, Bijay Jassal (Reactome/EBI), Mary Dolan (MGI - attending remotely).
TBC: Lisa Matthews? Jan Skotheim?
Agenda: to be prepared. Arrange conference call after the Berkeley workshop?