Ontology meeting 2014-07-24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Did we agree some guidelines for creating 'buckets' under protein complex? I think we can all agree we don't want to persist with a mahoosive flat list of complexes (ala 'protein' in PRO) so we need some basis on which we choose groupings - did we decide MF groupings only? See [https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/10544/]. | Did we agree some guidelines for creating 'buckets' under protein complex? I think we can all agree we don't want to persist with a mahoosive flat list of complexes (ala 'protein' in PRO) so we need some basis on which we choose groupings - did we decide MF groupings only? See [https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/10544/]. | ||
===Migration of GO annotation extensions relations editors file to OWL=== | |||
[[Category:Ontology]] | [[Category:Ontology]] | ||
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] |
Revision as of 11:30, 23 July 2014
Attendees:
Minutes:
Overriding obsolete check in TG
Do we want to relax the TG check for whether an obsolete term with the same name already exists? Can we allow editors to override?
Rationale for creating subtypes of protein complex
Did we agree some guidelines for creating 'buckets' under protein complex? I think we can all agree we don't want to persist with a mahoosive flat list of complexes (ala 'protein' in PRO) so we need some basis on which we choose groupings - did we decide MF groupings only? See [1].