Ontology meeting 2014-09-25: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Redundant links (i.e. where A is_a B and something is classified under both A and B) are causing problems in cell cycle - there's a lot of mess it's difficult to see what's going on. Let's discuss where we are with the workflow and removing these automatically. Could we possibly do a one-off removal for now? | Redundant links (i.e. where A is_a B and something is classified under both A and B) are causing problems in cell cycle - there's a lot of mess it's difficult to see what's going on. Let's discuss where we are with the workflow and removing these automatically. Could we possibly do a one-off removal for now? | ||
=== Inferences & Jenkins === | |||
See email thread [go-ontology] build-go-assert-inferences - Build # 92 - Failure! | |||
===negatively_regulates o part_of/positively_regulates o part_of=== | ===negatively_regulates o part_of/positively_regulates o part_of=== | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 23 September 2014
Attendees:
Minutes:
Follow-up on 'transport'
See action items here - where are we? http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2014-09-11#Transport_terms_.28carried_over_from_last_week.29
Accumulation of inferred links
Redundant links (i.e. where A is_a B and something is classified under both A and B) are causing problems in cell cycle - there's a lot of mess it's difficult to see what's going on. Let's discuss where we are with the workflow and removing these automatically. Could we possibly do a one-off removal for now?
Inferences & Jenkins
See email thread [go-ontology] build-go-assert-inferences - Build # 92 - Failure!
negatively_regulates o part_of/positively_regulates o part_of
Did you add these chains yet Chris? Need them for SF 11166
Merges in Protege
Anyone managed this before? My OE is broken.