Ontology meeting 2016-03-24: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
Did we get a chance to work on this? Shall we give ourselves one more week only, and then roll out regardless of completion? (End of March was indeed the 'deadline' we'd given ourselves.)
Did we get a chance to work on this? Shall we give ourselves one more week only, and then roll out regardless of completion? (End of March was indeed the 'deadline' we'd given ourselves.)


==use of location in MF transporter terms==
  example: periplasm (in) , etc.


[[Category:Ontology]]
[[Category:Ontology]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meetings]]

Revision as of 16:15, 23 March 2016

Attendees:

Minutes: David H?

has_participant relation

On Tuesday's annotation call, we discussed the use of has_participant in annotation extensions. Currently it is used in logical definitions for terms like cell-cell adhesion. We need to discuss the use of this relation.

Follow-up: vesicular transport

Revise for consensus:

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12317

Follow-up: ETINES

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2016-03-10#ETINES

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bSkgMxMHm5Aqw6UuTzTNXuTbjVZ7Uvuyos4VrLk5y4c/edit#gid=0

Did we get a chance to work on this? Shall we give ourselves one more week only, and then roll out regardless of completion? (End of March was indeed the 'deadline' we'd given ourselves.)

use of location in MF transporter terms

 example: periplasm (in) , etc.