Ontology meeting 2016-08-18: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Attendees: Minutes: ===Review capitalisation of terms=== https://github.com/cmungall/capital-offence https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12541 https://gi...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The two reports do not fully overlap in aim and group target. Both are useful. Do changes in the pipeline mean we can't have the watchers email, or did it just slip through and can be easily revived? | The two reports do not fully overlap in aim and group target. Both are useful. Do changes in the pipeline mean we can't have the watchers email, or did it just slip through and can be easily revived? | ||
===Add inter-ontology links to go-basic and stop materializing inferred annotations from inter-ontology links=== | |||
Does this need to be discussed on an editors call? At the time of writing, consensus seems to be to discuss at an annotation call instead. | |||
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1427 | |||
[[Category:Ontology]] | [[Category:Ontology]] | ||
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] | ||
Revision as of 10:46, 12 August 2016
Attendees:
Minutes:
Review capitalisation of terms
https://github.com/cmungall/capital-offence
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12541
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12540
Daily report of terms and stats
Currently, we (editors) receive a daily report of inference changes, but as of July 12th, the wider group (go-watchers) no longer receives the daily report of definition changes, obsoletions, term stats etc. The two reports do not fully overlap in aim and group target. Both are useful. Do changes in the pipeline mean we can't have the watchers email, or did it just slip through and can be easily revived?
Add inter-ontology links to go-basic and stop materializing inferred annotations from inter-ontology links
Does this need to be discussed on an editors call? At the time of writing, consensus seems to be to discuss at an annotation call instead.