Difference between revisions of "Ontology meeting 2016-09-22"

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:


But conidium is also: FAO:0000024 conidium
But conidium is also: FAO:0000024 conidium
===Reinstate daily report of terms and stats===
Ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/217
The ticket says that this is fixed, but no one has seen the report.


===Follow-up: How to report potential/necessary changes to annotations resulting from edits ===
===Follow-up: How to report potential/necessary changes to annotations resulting from edits ===

Revision as of 05:53, 21 September 2016

Attendees:

Regrets:

Minutes:

FAO update

  • FAO now has a home on github
  • We have a partial axiomatization of some fungal CCs and BPs using FAO - now in import chain
  • See Inferences Changes Report for: 2016-08-24 - e.g.
[Term]
+id: GO:0075251 ! uredospore formation
+is_a: GO:0044711 {is_inferred="true"} ! single-organism biosynthetic process

So now which ontologies get precedence for axioms?

[Term]

id: GO:0048315
name: conidium formation
namespace: biological_process
def: "Formation of asexual, nonmotile spores in fungi, by conversion of hyphal elements or arising from specialized sporogenous cells." [ISBN:0963117211, PMID:2524423, PMID:9529886]
synonym: "conidia biosynthesis" EXACT []
synonym: "conidia formation" EXACT []
is_a: GO:0030436 ! asexual sporulation
is_a: GO:0048646 ! anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis
intersection_of: GO:0048646 ! anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis
intersection_of: results_in_formation_of CL:0000599 ! conidium

But conidium is also: FAO:0000024 conidium

Reinstate daily report of terms and stats

Ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/217

The ticket says that this is fixed, but no one has seen the report.

Follow-up: How to report potential/necessary changes to annotations resulting from edits

See background discussion here http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2016-09-15#How_to_report_potential.2Fnecessary_changes_to_annotations_resulting_from_edits

Table is here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nAquF0oXHU6d638Q97ZeQ7K7DOhuru84-rOMEL4A114/edit#gid=0. At time of writing, it still needs input from some groups - these have been reminded.