Ontology meeting 2018-09-10

From GO Wiki
Revision as of 15:11, 7 September 2018 by Hdrabkin (talk | contribs) (→‎Agenda)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conference Line


For CHEBI ids, new ECs, Rhea? Should GO editors or requestors follow up with EC and/or RHEA requests?

Can we put terms into GO while waiting for ids outside of ontology?

Editors Discussion

Project Update

  • RO meeting to take place in Colorado in October

Ontology Developers' workshop possibility

The meeting will focus on (Depending on who can attend):

  • creating good logical definitions in both a general context and in the context of the GO-Reactome-Rhea alignment
    • Filling in missing GO-Rhea xrefs
    • moving from reactions to biochemical pathways
    • implementation of a method to keep in synch with all three resources
    • GO-CAM templates for pathways??
  • potential implementation of Design Patterns and the revival of some type of TermGenie ability
  • GH ticket work and mini-project planning
  • Attendees
    • David H (Can make it)
    • Kimberly (Can make it)
    • Karen
    • Harold (Can make it)
    • Pascale (Can make it)
    • Barbara (Maybe make it)
    • Alan B (Rhea, can make any day)
    • Anne (Rhea, prefers Monday or Tuesday)
    • Chris
    • Peter D?
    • Ben?
    • Jim?


OBI ticket: https://github.com/obi-ontology/obi/issues/963

Failures due to use in other ontologies

Friday after much discussion, Rachael and I tried to finally obsolete lamina reticularis. When we created the pull request, the Travis check failed due to the use of the term in Uberon. Do we really want this behavior? It will make us dependent on other ontologies to proceed with our work.

https://travis-ci.org/geneontology/go-ontology/builds/425727676?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/16345

GH project link



  • On call: