Ontology meeting 2019-11-18: Difference between revisions
m (→GOREL & RO) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===GOREL & RO=== | ===GOREL & RO=== | ||
(Pascale): I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from | (Pascale): I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from GOREL, but it's still in RO. Should we ask to remove it ? (Is all of RO loaded in GOREL?) | ||
==Other Business== | ==Other Business== |
Revision as of 09:10, 18 November 2019
Conference Line
See calendar for details
On call:
Agenda
Discussion topics
GOREL relation 'mediated_by'
Usage is inconsistent:
We have cases where some process is mediated by a molecule, e.g.: - 'gene silencing' and (mediated_by some 'ribonucleic acid’) - TOR signaling intracellular signal transduction' and (mediated_by some 'TOR complex’)'
Is this different from enabled_by ?
by an organelle:
- vesicle-mediated transport: 'transport and (mediated_by some vesicle)’
by a cell, e.g.
- B cell cytokine production (mediated_by some B cell)
For the B cell cytokine production, should the relation be ‘occurs_in' B cell ?
What do we want to do about this relation:
- We can define it better and clean up its usage in the ontology
- Or replace it ?
Creating ShEx shapes for specific GO terms
- Comparison of relation use in the ontology, dos-dps, and annotation import specs
- Spreadsheet
GOREL & RO
(Pascale): I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from GOREL, but it's still in RO. Should we ask to remove it ? (Is all of RO loaded in GOREL?)
Other Business
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1