Ontology meeting 2019-11-18: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


===GOREL & RO===
===GOREL & RO===
(Pascale): I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from GOREL, but it's still in RO. Should we ask to remove it ? (Is all of RO loaded in GOREL?)
(Pascale):  
* I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from GOREL, but it's still in RO (and therefore still in GOREL). Should we ask to remove it ? (Is all of RO loaded in GOREL?)
 
* Do we want to keep the relation 'has regulatory target' for targets that are not directly bound - for example to express the relationship between a transcription factor and the gene its regulates ? At the GOC meeting it seemed like we wanted to keep that notion.


==Other Business==
==Other Business==

Revision as of 09:15, 18 November 2019

Conference Line

See calendar for details

On call:

Agenda

Discussion topics

GOREL relation 'mediated_by'

Usage is inconsistent:

We have cases where some process is mediated by a molecule, e.g.: - 'gene silencing' and (mediated_by some 'ribonucleic acid’) - TOR signaling intracellular signal transduction' and (mediated_by some 'TOR complex’)'


Is this different from enabled_by ?


by an organelle: - vesicle-mediated transport: 'transport and (mediated_by some vesicle)’ by a cell, e.g. - B cell cytokine production (mediated_by some B cell)

For the B cell cytokine production, should the relation be ‘occurs_in' B cell ?


What do we want to do about this relation:

  • We can define it better and clean up its usage in the ontology
  • Or replace it ?

Creating ShEx shapes for specific GO terms

  • Comparison of relation use in the ontology, dos-dps, and annotation import specs
  • Spreadsheet

GOREL & RO

(Pascale):

  • I have removed the relation 'has_direct_input' from GOREL, but it's still in RO (and therefore still in GOREL). Should we ask to remove it ? (Is all of RO loaded in GOREL?)
  • Do we want to keep the relation 'has regulatory target' for targets that are not directly bound - for example to express the relationship between a transcription factor and the gene its regulates ? At the GOC meeting it seemed like we wanted to keep that notion.

Other Business

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1

Minutes should be recorded on individual tickets and in individual projects