Ontology meeting 2022-01-24: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
Implemented in ontology  
Implemented in ontology  
see for example GO:2001077
see for example GO:2001077
Question: do we need to remove the 'conforms to dp' when we obsolete terms? Are these automatically calculated at each GO release?


===Protein-complex organization/assembly/disassembly===
===Protein-complex organization/assembly/disassembly===

Revision as of 09:08, 18 January 2022

  • Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
  • Present:
  • Regrets:

Announcements

Agenda

Following up on previous items

ChEBI update

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/22092 Jan 1 release was supposed to remove the links of fumaric acid, succinic acid, and malonic acid to lipid; can we start the import again?

Design patterns

Implemented in ontology see for example GO:2001077

Question: do we need to remove the 'conforms to dp' when we obsolete terms? Are these automatically calculated at each GO release?

Protein-complex organization/assembly/disassembly

Problem with relations used in logical definition https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22488

RO has been changed, so that the logical issue is fixed; however do we want to use 'results in assembly of' or 'has output' for protein-containing complex assembly? This decision impacts the relations used in GO-CAM and extensions, since we aim to align them.

Other Business

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1