Ontology meeting 2023-03-13: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Group members:''' Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Karen, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
* '''Group members:''' Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
* '''Present:'''  
* '''Present:''' Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
* '''Regrets:'''
* '''Regrets:'''


Line 10: Line 10:
* New Instruction page [[Protege5_6_setup_for_GO_Eds]] in progress
* New Instruction page [[Protege5_6_setup_for_GO_Eds]] in progress
* Jim testing ontology build: [https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/25019#issuecomment-1444987133] 
* Jim testing ontology build: [https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/25019#issuecomment-1444987133] 
* Noting issue with ID ranges : Jim renamed our ID range file because this feature is broken. ID ranges will keep on working the same way they were before
* Today: Will get everyone started
* Today: Will get everyone started
* Review unmerged pull requests - will need to have conflicts resolved or redone after new Protege save
==Reviewing pending PRs==
* '''AI: Review GOCHE documentation''' (confusion about ChEBI roles and GOCHE roles)
* '''AI: Check with terms use GOCHE terms'''
* '''AI: Close open PRs'''


=Script to download annotations=
=Script to download annotations=
Line 29: Line 36:
is_a pyrophosphatase, not a phosphatase
is_a pyrophosphatase, not a phosphatase


[[Guidelines_for_logical_definitions | Logical definitions]] should do most of the work for us


== Procedure to mark terms to be obsoleted==
== Procedure to mark terms to be obsoleted==
Line 39: Line 47:
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24489  
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24489  
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24490
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24490
==CARO vs UBERON==
*https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/issues/695
*Implications for ontology development and ShEx


=GO, RHEA, EC aligment=
=GO, RHEA, EC aligment=

Latest revision as of 04:32, 20 March 2023

  • Group members: Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
  • Present: Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
  • Regrets:

GOC consortium

  • April 27th-29th, Padua, Italy
  • Any suggestions for working group sessions?

New Protege version

  • New Instruction page Protege5_6_setup_for_GO_Eds in progress
  • Jim testing ontology build: [1] 
  • Noting issue with ID ranges : Jim renamed our ID range file because this feature is broken. ID ranges will keep on working the same way they were before
  • Today: Will get everyone started
  • Review unmerged pull requests - will need to have conflicts resolved or redone after new Protege save

Reviewing pending PRs

  • AI: Review GOCHE documentation (confusion about ChEBI roles and GOCHE roles)
  • AI: Check with terms use GOCHE terms
  • AI: Close open PRs

Script to download annotations

Editors discussion items

Obsolete versus merge

Are there situations where we can merge? see

Phagocytosis versus endocytsosis

Asserted classes versus logical definitions

Example: mRNA phosphatase activity is_a pyrophosphatase, not a phosphatase

 Logical definitions should do most of the work for us

Procedure to mark terms to be obsoleted

  • This would give curators and editors of ontologies using GO a way to know which terms are scheduled for obsoletion
  • There is a property that we can use

Test new process to when obsoleting terms with taxon constraints

  • Use GH actions ? Pascale to test

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24489 https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24490

CARO vs UBERON

GO, RHEA, EC aligment

Tickets by ontology editors