Ontology meeting 2023-03-13
- Group members: Pascale, Raymond, Val, Edith, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Karen, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
- Present:
- Regrets:
GOC consortium
- April 27th-29th, Padua, Italy
- Any suggestions for working group sessions?
New Protege version
- New Instruction page Protege5_6_setup_for_GO_Eds in progress
- Jim testing ontology build: [1]
- Noting issue with ID ranges
- Today: Will get everyone started
Script to download annotations
- Moved the script in the go-annotation repo - status
- Instructions >>> https://wiki.geneontology.org/Obsoleting_an_Existing_Ontology_Term#2._Create_an_Annotation_Review_Request_ticket_and_add_the_link_in_the_GitHub_ticket.
Editors discussion items
Obsolete versus merge
Are there situations where we can merge? see
- x involved in y: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24990
- more specific substrates: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24738
Phagocytosis versus endocytsosis
Asserted classes versus logical definitions
Example: mRNA phosphatase activity is_a pyrophosphatase, not a phosphatase
Logical definitions should do most of the work for us
Procedure to mark terms to be obsoleted
- This would give curators and editors of ontologies using GO a way to know which terms are scheduled for obsoletion
- There is a property that we can use
Test new process to when obsoleting terms with taxon constraints
- Use GH actions ? Pascale to test
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24489 https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/24490
GO, RHEA, EC aligment
- Created a project in the go-ontology repo
- Will update guidelines
- Question: Do we need to keep comments about obsolete/transferred ECs, such as GO:0047091 , has comment "Note that EC:1.13.12.10 was merged into this term."