PAMGO conference calls: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Content PAMGO]] | |||
=='''PAMGO Conference Call-March 18, 2008'''== | |||
'''Update on association files submitted to GOC:''' | |||
gene_association.PAMGO_Atumefaciens.gz | |||
gene_association.PAMGO_Oomycetes.gz | |||
gene_association.PAMGO_Magnaporthe grisea.gz | |||
'''Issues arising from proposed terms on infection processes in fungi and oomycetes, under discussion by the fungal and oomycete groups. (Credit to Shaowu for taking the initiative on the term development ''' | |||
The set of new terms (about 50) will be sent out after the two groups have finished working on it but there are some general issues which we thought we could bring up at the conference call for discussion. | |||
One of the terms in the proposal is "lesion development" We would want to hear other views on how to deal with cellular and tissue damage. Is "cell killing" the only appropriate term? What if you are looking at chlorotic or water-soaked lesions. | |||
The second issue is whether we need child terms of pathogenesis viz regulation of pathogenesis, positive and negative regulation of pathogenesis. Is that a possibility or we are all convinced that pathogenesis should have no child terms | |||
'''Changing wording in some host terms''' | |||
At the last conference call, I mentioned I was rewording some of the host terms already incorporated in the GO. Attached is a file of the original host terms and the changes I made to some of these terms, based on an earlier discussion and comments sent by some members of the group. Please look at the terms again, confirm that they should remain in the ontology and correct wording where necessary. Send corrected files to me by e-mail (trudy@vbi.vt.edu). Unresolved issues will be discussed at the conference call. | |||
[[Image:ChecK_Host_terms.xls]] | |||
'''"Induction" and "Up-regulated" terms ''' | |||
At the last meeting, there was a consensus on making the "induction" and "up-regulation" terms synonyms of the parent term "positive regulation" Find attached, a list of the terms tagged to be collapsed into the respective parent terms. [[Image:Induction_Upregulation.doc]] | |||
=='''PAMGO Conference Call-February 15 2008'''== | =='''PAMGO Conference Call-February 15 2008'''== | ||
Line 5: | Line 37: | ||
gene_association.PAMGO_Atumefaciens.gz | gene_association.PAMGO_Atumefaciens.gz | ||
gene_association.PAMGO_Oomycetes.gz | gene_association.PAMGO_Oomycetes.gz | ||
Line 31: | Line 65: | ||
Induction and Up-regulation of........ are currently child terms of positive regulation. Should this be merged into positive | Induction and Up-regulation of........ are currently child terms of positive regulation. Should this be merged into positive | ||
regulation? Many of the induction and upregulation terms are synonyms of their respective "positive regulation" parent terms | regulation? Many of the induction and upregulation terms are synonyms of their respective "positive regulation" parent terms. | ||
See examples:[[Image: | See examples: [[Image:Merge_into_positive_reg.doc]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:46, 8 April 2014
PAMGO Conference Call-March 18, 2008
Update on association files submitted to GOC: gene_association.PAMGO_Atumefaciens.gz gene_association.PAMGO_Oomycetes.gz gene_association.PAMGO_Magnaporthe grisea.gz
Issues arising from proposed terms on infection processes in fungi and oomycetes, under discussion by the fungal and oomycete groups. (Credit to Shaowu for taking the initiative on the term development
The set of new terms (about 50) will be sent out after the two groups have finished working on it but there are some general issues which we thought we could bring up at the conference call for discussion.
One of the terms in the proposal is "lesion development" We would want to hear other views on how to deal with cellular and tissue damage. Is "cell killing" the only appropriate term? What if you are looking at chlorotic or water-soaked lesions.
The second issue is whether we need child terms of pathogenesis viz regulation of pathogenesis, positive and negative regulation of pathogenesis. Is that a possibility or we are all convinced that pathogenesis should have no child terms
Changing wording in some host terms
At the last conference call, I mentioned I was rewording some of the host terms already incorporated in the GO. Attached is a file of the original host terms and the changes I made to some of these terms, based on an earlier discussion and comments sent by some members of the group. Please look at the terms again, confirm that they should remain in the ontology and correct wording where necessary. Send corrected files to me by e-mail (trudy@vbi.vt.edu). Unresolved issues will be discussed at the conference call. File:ChecK Host terms.xls
"Induction" and "Up-regulated" terms
At the last meeting, there was a consensus on making the "induction" and "up-regulation" terms synonyms of the parent term "positive regulation" Find attached, a list of the terms tagged to be collapsed into the respective parent terms. File:Induction Upregulation.doc
PAMGO Conference Call-February 15 2008
Update on association files submitted to GOC:
gene_association.PAMGO_Atumefaciens.gz gene_association.PAMGO_Oomycetes.gz
Update on association files for:
P. syringae Erwinia sp M. grisea
GOC announcement: Regulation terms
"For some time now, the GO content developers have been aware that regulatory processes are not necessarily integral to the processes (as previously indicated by the use of the 'part_of' relation) that they regulate. Nevertheless, regulatory processes have been represented as part_of the processes they regulate. We have long intended to replace these part_of relationships with a new relationship type called 'regulates'. We are now in a position to make this replacement" See entire e-mail: File:New relationship types in GO.doc Most of the modulation/regulation terms have a is_a relationship to parents Few with part_of relationships, which should still be fine if "part_of" is replaced with "regulates" See examples: File:Regulates relationship.doc
Induction and Upregulation terms
Induction and Up-regulation of........ are currently child terms of positive regulation. Should this be merged into positive regulation? Many of the induction and upregulation terms are synonyms of their respective "positive regulation" parent terms. See examples: File:Merge into positive reg.doc
Changing wording in some host terms
Will put a list on the wiki soon for your comments
Mini Reviews
Report
Use of PAMGO terms by virulence community-Michelle
PAMGO workshop July 14-16 2008
Please print out attached brochure and distribute at meetings/conferences you plan on attending before July We need to attract a diverse group of people this year. Download brochure: File:Workshop Brochure.pdf
Others
PAMGO Conference Call-November 15 2007
Test set of annotations sent to Chris Mungall (GOC) File:PAMGO test assoc.xls
New "Properties" column in the association file
Updated Evidence Code documentation. http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml New children codes under ISS (still under review)
Topic for discussion: Hypersensitive response (HR) and Programmed cell death (PCD) tree
See "PAMGO SUMMARY_2007" for Candace's proposal on this subject