Projects update meeting 2022-06-29: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Attendees) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Members: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Paul, Chris, Cynthia | * Members: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Paul, Chris, Cynthia | ||
* Present: | * Present: Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Cynthia | ||
* Regrets: David | * Regrets: David, Paul, Chris | ||
==GOC meeting== | ==GOC meeting== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Loading widgets into AmiGO== | ==Loading widgets into AmiGO== | ||
[https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/650 Preliminary work indicates that this is not too much work] | * [https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/650 Preliminary work indicates that this is not too much work] | ||
What's next? How high of a priority is this? | What's next? How high of a priority is this? | ||
* Need to decide exactly what we want - needs have a proper project and propose some specs and deliverables (and PI, PO, TL) | |||
==Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'== | ==Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'== |
Latest revision as of 11:43, 29 June 2022
Attendees
- Members: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Paul, Chris, Cynthia
- Present: Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Cynthia
- Regrets: David, Paul, Chris
GOC meeting
Only 15 people would attend in person, out of 30 responses: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/14pCJd-tiYtVB0prij_EXc1F80Vqfvnuc0sBe_Gdolf4/edit#responses
Ongoing work updates
Google drive move
https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/90
- Status: will check and report next week
Adding SO terms as valid range for 'occurs in' annotation extension
- Curators would like to be able to specify chromosomal regions where MFs occur
- Right now, SO terms are not a valid range for 'occurs in'
- Any reason(s) not to add SO terms as a valid range?
- A few years ago, there was discussion of MSO vs SO that might have had some bearing on this, but that discussion seems to have tailed off.
SynGO Updates
- Actions
- Pascale to check annotations
- If looks OK, request feedback from Frank
Model copy
- Status
- Tremayne submitted PR; Seth updated noctua-dev
- Tomorrow morning - Kimberly will systematically test
- This is a large PR with changes to multiple workbenches besides model copy; will require some pretty thorough testing
- Workbenches at 10am PDT Thursday - aiming to make a call on moving to production by then - Tuesday, July 5th target date?
Loading widgets into AmiGO
What's next? How high of a priority is this?
- Need to decide exactly what we want - needs have a proper project and propose some specs and deliverables (and PI, PO, TL)
Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'
MOU draft
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T1yW4dPaztjTJIkDPLBi3ob_-IGiqkP-kvGscprYijY/edit#
- update contributors list: http://geneontology.org/docs/go-consortium/
- unify with: http://geneontology.org/docs/annotation-contributors/
- http://geneontology.org/docs/collaborations/
Can this be automated from the yaml?
- CHRIS: YES!!!!