Projects update meeting 2022-07-06: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
==Documentation==
==Documentation==
===Process for review and approval of documentation===
===Process for review and approval of documentation===
Can someone provide more context on this? [[User:Cjm|Cjm]] ([[User talk:Cjm|talk]]) 20:42, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
* Who?  
* Who?  
** managers? form a 'documentation committee'?  
** managers? form a 'documentation committee'?  
* How?  
* How?  
** set up calls? via email/google docs + comments?  
** set up calls? via email/google docs + comments?
 


===Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'===
===Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'===
Line 23: Line 25:
===Google drive move===
===Google drive move===
https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/90
https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/90
* Suzy to report on status
* Suzy to report on status & check on other people
* Chris to move his files


===[https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/80 Model copy]===
===[https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/80 Model copy]===
* Status
* Status
** Latest software updates are now on noctua-dev
** Kimberly is aiming to test later today


=== Adding SO terms as valid range for 'occurs in' annotation extension ===
=== Adding SO terms as valid range for 'occurs in' annotation extension ===
Line 33: Line 38:
* Any reason(s) not to add SO terms as a valid range?
* Any reason(s) not to add SO terms as a valid range?
** A few years ago, there was discussion of MSO vs SO that might have had some bearing on this, but that discussion seems to have tailed off.
** A few years ago, there was discussion of MSO vs SO that might have had some bearing on this, but that discussion seems to have tailed off.
** Chris: Right, now it's just SO


=== [https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/37 SynGO Updates] ===
=== [https://github.com/geneontology/syngo-go-cams/issues/3 SynGO Updates] ===
 


===Loading widgets into AmiGO===
===Loading widgets into AmiGO===
* [https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/650 Preliminary work indicates that this is not too much work]  
* [https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/650 Preliminary work indicates that this is not too much work]  
** Before we drop the pathway widget in AmiGO, we should first fix: https://github.com/geneontology/api-gorest-2021/issues/6
** no blockers for dropping in ribbon
*** do we want to use the AGR slim?
What's next? How high of a priority is this?
What's next? How high of a priority is this?
* Need to decide exactly what we want - needs have a proper project and propose some specs and deliverables (and PI, PO, TL)
* Need to decide exactly what we want - needs have a proper project and propose some specs and deliverables (and PI, PO, TL)

Latest revision as of 12:01, 6 July 2022

Attendees

  • Members: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Paul, Chris, Cynthia
  • Present:
  • Regrets:

GOC meeting

Documentation

Process for review and approval of documentation

Can someone provide more context on this? Cjm (talk) 20:42, 5 July 2022 (EDT)

  • Who?
    • managers? form a 'documentation committee'?
  • How?
    • set up calls? via email/google docs + comments?

Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'

https://wiki.geneontology.org/Annotation_Extension_Relation:has_input#Distinction_between_'has_input'_and_'with/from'

Ongoing work updates

Google drive move

https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/90

  • Suzy to report on status & check on other people
  • Chris to move his files

Model copy

  • Status
    • Latest software updates are now on noctua-dev
    • Kimberly is aiming to test later today

Adding SO terms as valid range for 'occurs in' annotation extension

  • Curators would like to be able to specify chromosomal regions where MFs occur
  • Right now, SO terms are not a valid range for 'occurs in'
  • Any reason(s) not to add SO terms as a valid range?
    • A few years ago, there was discussion of MSO vs SO that might have had some bearing on this, but that discussion seems to have tailed off.
    • Chris: Right, now it's just SO

SynGO Updates

Loading widgets into AmiGO

What's next? How high of a priority is this?

  • Need to decide exactly what we want - needs have a proper project and propose some specs and deliverables (and PI, PO, TL)

MOU draft

Can this be automated from the yaml?

  • CHRIS: YES!!!!

Potential priorities short list

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TrxTZMRMAS0BCektM79nqvcZq8R3PXEMVWd_CbW-RfI/edit#heading=h.nntgv5th4cph