SLC GO Consortium Meeting

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Venue

Meeting Room

  • Conference Room 4 is the large conference room on the 4th floor, located behind the front desk to the right.
  • We are not allowed to put posters up to direct you, but if you get lost, the library staff will point you in the right direction.

Dates:

  • April 22-23, 2008
  • We will be providing lunch.
  • Dinner TBA

Cost

  • $50.00; Receipt will be provided
  • Dinner: cost TBD; we are looking for a sponsor
  • You are responsible for your lodging costs

Lodging:

  • The University GuestHouseis a good place to stay as it is a short walk to HSEB. If you are also attending the Reference Genome Meeting, it is a small walk from the that venue, and a tram ride from the library - door to door.
  • Please make reservations early as it is a popular place and there will be extra people in town for the marathon.
  • If you need to make other arrangements let me know (Karen E) and I will find a different hotel.
  • The | University_Marriott at the university is a cab ride from both venues.
  • There are many hotels downtown with reasonable rates such as the Little America and the Red Lion.
  • The Downtown_Marriott within walking distance of the library, but it is $259 per night!

Registration

Please [Register] for one or both meetings.

Agenda Items

At the moment this is a free-form list of items suggested for discussion.

  1. Have Tanya give short presentation on implementation of 'regulates' and the work that she and David and Chris (and others) have done in this area. 'Regulates' will go live at the end of March, so there may be discussion points on this.
  2. Discuss how we are going to handle function terms such as activators and inhibitors. When do we create them and how do they relate to processes and other functions. (David and Tanya)
  3. Discuss how we are going to handle 'response to drug' SF 1242405 terms. Are they normal biological processes? (David and Tanya)
  4. Discuss function-process links. What relationships should we use? Who will make the assertions?(David, Tanya & Chris)
    1. See current work and discussions [|Here]
  5. (sigh) evidence codes