Talk:2010 GO camp Annotation of complexes issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
GO: Any macromolecular complex composed of two or more polypeptide subunits, which may or may not be identical. Protein complexes may have other associated non-protein prosthetic groups, such as nucleotides, metal ions or other small molecules. | GO: Any macromolecular complex composed of two or more polypeptide subunits, which may or may not be identical. Protein complexes may have other associated non-protein prosthetic groups, such as nucleotides, metal ions or other small molecules. | ||
Q: do transient complexes qualify? <br> | |||
A: grey area- for example cdk/cyclin is considered a complex; rather a case-by case basis | A: grey area- for example cdk/cyclin is considered a complex; rather a case-by case basis | ||
Q: How are different species captured? <br> | |||
A: right now all spp are kept separate; look for experimental support for the complex. NOT propagating complexes. | A: right now all spp are kept separate; look for experimental support for the complex. NOT propagating complexes. |
Revision as of 09:19, 27 April 2010
- Could we possibly use IntAct to perform annotations
IntAct: a complex is something that can be purified , ideally has a function
GO: Any macromolecular complex composed of two or more polypeptide subunits, which may or may not be identical. Protein complexes may have other associated non-protein prosthetic groups, such as nucleotides, metal ions or other small molecules.
Q: do transient complexes qualify?
A: grey area- for example cdk/cyclin is considered a complex; rather a case-by case basis
Q: How are different species captured?
A: right now all spp are kept separate; look for experimental support for the complex. NOT propagating complexes.